Rajudas, priest of Hanumangarhi.
– Photo: Amar Ujala
Expansion
BJP is stuck in a dilemma in the matter of the debate between Hanumangarhi priest Raju Das and DM Nitish Kumar and the removal of security. The senior leaders of the party are avoiding saying anything in this matter. While the workers are raising the question of self-respect. The organization has sent its report to the state president on this issue. Amidst all this, the debate on social media is not stopping.
In the presence of two ministers of the state government, Surya Pratap Shahi and Jaiveer Singh, the discussions on the tussle between the priest and the DM in the Saryu Guest House are not stopping. Along with BJP officials and workers, administrative officers and common people are discussing what will happen next? Meanwhile, Raju Das has met Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath and presented his side on the whole matter. On the other hand, the DM has already accepted that he had refused to sit with the priest because of his criminal nature.
Even four days after the incident, the pro and anti statements are still being made on social media. For example, a business leader associated with BJP writes in his post that the case of Pujari Raju Das will reveal whether BJP is with the workers or with the officers. Checking the comment box of this post shows how much restlessness there is about this matter within the party itself. Someone says that if the dignity of the workers is not taken care of, then the wrong message will be sent. There are also many people who are sharing the copy of the FIR lodged against Raju Das in the police stations.
-When BJP District President Sanjeev Singh was asked what is the party’s stand in this controversial case, he said that a detailed report has been sent by the organization to the state president Bhupendra Chaudhary. All the things have been mentioned in it. Now the party leadership has to decide, we have done our work. He also added that when this incident happened, two ministers of the state government were present there. They must have also informed the government and the organization about the facts in the case.
